chrisskellinton wrote: » It's not your business........I wish teachers would stop trying to be doctors, therapist and social workers.They barely have control of their class.
trivard676 wrote: » I grew up eating Lunchables and a not-actually-milk milkshake for most of Kindergarten, and that was it. No apple or celery for a snack, no carrots or salad, nothing else. Would you call that healthy? Would you talk to my parents face to face about how you disapproved of their food choices for their child? Or would you silently thank them for feeding me at all? Is this a child that is being abused or neglected otherwise? Does the family not have enough money to spend on other, healthier foods? I know, that sounds ridiculous, but junk food is often times less expensive than healthier alternatives. Are there any other indicators of abuse or neglect? If not, I'm afraid that you're going to have to educate on healthier alternatives during (if you have one) a food and nutrition course. If this is something that really bothers you, talk to the principal about implementing policies about no energy drinks at school. Energy drink aside (because kids shouldn't be drinking those), this could be an instance where mom and dad are doing the best they can and giving them a breakfast and little Janie decided that she wanted some Cheetos before school. I would only intervene if there were indicators of abuse or neglect. We all want the best for future generations, but sometimes we have to pick our battles.
BinkyBonk wrote: » chrisskellinton wrote: » It's not your business........I wish teachers would stop trying to be doctors, therapist and social workers.They barely have control of their class. Hardly any wonder if kids are allowed to consume energy drinks. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
Ah, didn't say they were, read again please. Comment not directed to you btw. Entitled to my opinion. Thanks anyway.
MikaMojito wrote: » Gotta jump back into the convo now that I'm back from school. I teach children and young adults age 10 to 18 and I don't just see myself as being the person who talks to them about history and literature but also as another person who cares for them. I know "my" kids. When one of them looks upset, I'll ask what's wrong. They tell me about poor grades or heartache or trouble with their classmates. I want them to grow up into healthy, happy adults. I give advice on how to study and - if they ask - about how to deal with situations in their person lives. One part of their life is how they eat. At my school, we don't ban candy bars etc and since I know how horrible it is to be fat-shamed, I don't talk to kids who are overweight about why they really shouldn't be having so much chocolate. And that's even though I see them eating it almost every afternoon. But when we're all at lunch, I encourage them to help themselves to some more salad or vegetables instead of only having meat and carbs. I do the same to normal-weight kids because healthy food matters. It's important for kids to eat a balanced diet so they can concentrate. But sometimes you DO have to step up as a teacher. It's not just my MORAL duty but where I live I have a LEGAL duty to inform my superior if I think one of my pupils has health issues such as substance abuse or eating disorders. One of my older girls fainted on me TWICE and had already tried to take her life once. I sat down with her and a colleague and talked with her, again and again until she admitted she was starving herself and that she'd been abused and that she was depressed. The support she got from us teachers and the headmaster helped her talk to her parents and they sent her to a hospital. She's back now and she's not yet healthy and happy but she's doing better. How could I ignore if one of "my" children is harming themselves? Parents don't always see these things and some don't want to see them. I only get involved in such extreme cases but I'm sad for some of my pupils who are on their way to obesity because their lunchboxes are filled with snickers and cola. They're so often not in the middle of the games, enjoying themselves because parents either didn't care or gave in to their nagging instead of giving them healtheir options. And I don't want to hurt them more than they're already hurting by telling them what they shouldn't eat. And to the guy who said teachers should stop trying to be a doctor, therapist or social worker. We would love to! Trust me. But if we don't reach out, nobody will. We owe it to the kids to try to help them, even if it's not strictly our line of work.
draznyth wrote: » However, none of the above has anything to do with someone stepping in and parenting other people's children for them. It's nunya. Take care of your own kids.
jorinya wrote: » I share my food with the less privileged so as not to waste it. I give water to those I see nearby who are thirsty and don't have any money to buy for themselves.
jorinya wrote: » draznyth wrote: » However, none of the above has anything to do with someone stepping in and parenting other people's children for them. It's nunya. Take care of your own kids. Excuse me but I do take care of my kids and some that don't have food to eat. I take care of their parents too. Where I am the people still believe that it takes a community to raise a child. I share my food with the less privileged so as not to waste it. I give water to those I see nearby who are thirsty and don't have any money to buy for themselves. I am no Mother Theresa but I try my best to help out especially with the kids in the school my kids attend. Sometimes other parents need a hand sometime and helping is not illegal, that's why there are social workers and councillors.
ksy1969 wrote: » Nope, but if I did, it is none of your business.
JoRocka wrote: » no you didn't- but you laid on the "my kids need to understand what healthy is" BS pretty thick. And much like you're entitled to your opinion- given that it's an open forum- I'm free to comment on your entitled opinion. Don't like it- take the conversation into a private message. And you're more than welcome- I aim to please.
JoRocka wrote: » do you find the wind messes up your hair at that altitude?
Mr_Knight wrote: » That has nothing to do with the conversation.
jorinya wrote: » draznyth wrote: » The amount of nanny state replies in this thread is alarming. Apparently Doritos = throwing your kid down a flight of stairs. Do you have any kids? If so, wouldn't you like them to be healthy? If not, wait till you do and then answer the questions. I have four kids and try my best to teach them from a young age about healthy food and healthy lifestyle. Its never too early to start eating healthy and can prevent later health issues. I give them snacks too but in moderation. Not having a go at you, just asking cos of what you commented.
draznyth wrote: » The amount of nanny state replies in this thread is alarming. Apparently Doritos = throwing your kid down a flight of stairs.
JoRocka wrote: » skinnyinnotime wrote: » The school should have a policy on what foods are allowed to be eaten there. If a child isn't fed a nutrional diet it is neglect. you can tell an entire child's diet from ONE bag of doritos and ONE can of red bull? I'm impressed- can you tell me the lotto numbers for next week too? PS- don't look at my weekend. It pretty much looks like I straight up had a weekend fling affair with the Debil. You know- because Sugar = Debil.
skinnyinnotime wrote: » The school should have a policy on what foods are allowed to be eaten there. If a child isn't fed a nutrional diet it is neglect.