beemerphile1 wrote: » First off, three days isn't going to make a real difference whatever you do. I would not strive for a deficit. Do you really want to be weak/faint when carrying your house on your back? One big problem when backpacking is carrying enough calories to replace what you burn. I would eat as much as able with no remorse.
kaseyr1505 wrote: » My husband and I are doing a 3 day backpacking trip. It should be about 55-60 miles, and 9,600 ft of elevation changes. Right now, I have a few more vanity pounds to lose, but nothing major (5-10lbs). Is it safe to eat a small (250-500) calorie deficit, or should I try to eat closer to my maintenance? Because I was going to be fairly active for 3 days, I wasn't sure if I should be feeding my body what it needs instead of trying to lose weight. I am going to be estimating calorie burns based off of previous hikes, and prelogging/packing food, so I can be as accurate as possible with the limited technology.
chanellecherington wrote: » I backpack with my husband and I burn upwards of 2000 calories over my TDEE some days. I wore my fitbit and heart rate monitor on a test hike (day trip but with fully loaded 22 pound pack) a few weeks ago. We went 12 miles with a 2200-2500 ft elevation gain. My fitbit and heart rate monitor both came in at approximately 1800 calories burned over my TDEE (I'm 5'6" and 162 pounds). So eat and eat a lot because chances are, even with your MREs you'll have a deficit. Try not to, though, because a hike like that is killer. You need the calories.