ruggedshutter wrote: » @jemhh that blog post is set to private
jemhh wrote: » I agree that these are more accurate. I also have found that the ones I linked to here are useful.
usmcmp wrote: » The biggest problem with putting out a visual of body fat percentage is that the amount of lean mass you have will make it look different. I have very high lean mass, so my body fat percentage looks higher than it is. There is no "give" to my body. The fat sits on top of the muscles. Another issue is that we don't all carry weight the same. I actually encourage people to evaluate how they look in a mirror and how their body feels. If it feels firm and looks lean, does it matter what your body fat percentage really is?
jemhh wrote: » usmcmp wrote: » The biggest problem with putting out a visual of body fat percentage is that the amount of lean mass you have will make it look different. I have very high lean mass, so my body fat percentage looks higher than it is. There is no "give" to my body. The fat sits on top of the muscles. Another issue is that we don't all carry weight the same. I actually encourage people to evaluate how they look in a mirror and how their body feels. If it feels firm and looks lean, does it matter what your body fat percentage really is? I would agree with this. I put that list of DEXA scanned images together after seeing a couple of threads started by women who wrote that they were shocked or embarrassed to have 25% or 26% body fat. If I remember right, one had been very happy with her overall look until she saw the number, when in reality 26% is completely healthy. Also, I'm always wary of the body fat charts because I wonder who made them and how did they decide that Person A was 20% body fat, Person B was 25%, etc.
usmcmp wrote: » The biggest problem with putting out a visual of body fat percentage is that the amount of lean mass you have will make it look different.
ythannah wrote: » usmcmp wrote: » The biggest problem with putting out a visual of body fat percentage is that the amount of lean mass you have will make it look different. Agree 100%. The examples in the low BF% categories are carrying way more lean mass than I am so my abs sure don't look like that... although I am apparently around 17 - 18%. I just look bony rather than muscular.
AmazonMayan wrote: » Every time I see this picture I wonder where the 41% - 49% example is.
usmcmp wrote: » ythannah wrote: » usmcmp wrote: » The biggest problem with putting out a visual of body fat percentage is that the amount of lean mass you have will make it look different. Agree 100%. The examples in the low BF% categories are carrying way more lean mass than I am so my abs sure don't look like that... although I am apparently around 17 - 18%. I just look bony rather than muscular. I like to post this one sometimes when body fat percentage comes up.
JenniferInCt wrote: » usmcmp wrote: » ythannah wrote: » usmcmp wrote: » The biggest problem with putting out a visual of body fat percentage is that the amount of lean mass you have will make it look different. Agree 100%. The examples in the low BF% categories are carrying way more lean mass than I am so my abs sure don't look like that... although I am apparently around 17 - 18%. I just look bony rather than muscular. I like to post this one sometimes when body fat percentage comes up. Wow! Mind blowing and eye opening
star1407 wrote: » I think the 15% pic on the right looks much nicer. I also like the 24% one more than the lesser ones. I think a little bit of curves looks sexier and more feminine